Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
Date
Msg-id 2b2f97d5-b2e9-564e-ea71-96dd62799e47@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
List pgsql-hackers
On 06.02.23 16:56, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I recently moved crake to a new machine running Fedora 36, which has 
> OpenSSL 3.0.0. This causes the SSL tests to fail on branches earlier 
> than release 13, so I propose to backpatch commit f0d2c65f17 to the 
> release 11 and 12 branches.

This is not the only patch that we did to support OpenSSL 3.0.0.  There 
was a very lengthy discussion that resulted in various patches.  Unless 
we have a complete analysis of what was done and how it affects various 
branches, I would not do this.  Notably, we did actually consider what 
to backpatch, and the current state is the result of that.  So let's not 
throw that away without considering that carefully.  Even if it gets it 
to compile, I personally would not *trust* it without that analysis.  I 
think we should just leave it alone and consider OpenSSL 3.0.0 
unsupported in the branches were it is now unsupported.  OpenSSL 1.1.1 
is still supported upstream to serve those releases.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Next
From: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication