On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:44 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:28 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:29 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
> > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, February 3, 2023 11:04 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 4:52 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Some minor review comments for v91-0001
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Pushed this yesterday after addressing your comments!
> > >
> > > Thanks for pushing.
> > >
> > > Currently, we have two remaining patches which we are not sure whether it's worth
> > > committing for now. Just share them here for reference.
> > >
> > > 0001:
> > >
> > > Based on our discussion[1] on -hackers, it's not clear that if it's necessary
> > > to add the sub-feature to stop extra worker when
> > > max_apply_workers_per_suibscription is reduced. Because:
> > >
> > > - it's not clear whether reducing the 'max_apply_workers_per_suibscription' is very
> > > common.
> >
> > A use case I'm concerned about is a temporarily intensive data load,
> > for example, a data loading batch job in a maintenance window. In this
> > case, the user might want to temporarily increase
> > max_parallel_workers_per_subscription in order to avoid a large
> > replication lag, and revert the change back to normal after the job.
> > If it's unlikely to stream the changes in the regular workload as
> > logical_decoding_work_mem is big enough to handle the regular
> > transaction data, the excess parallel workers won't exit.
> >
>
> Won't in such a case, it would be better to just switch off the
> parallel option for a subscription?
Not sure. Changing the parameter would be easier since it doesn't
require restarts.
> We need to think of a predictable
> way to test this path which may not be difficult. But I guess it would
> be better to wait for some feedback from the field about this feature
> before adding more to it and anyway it shouldn't be a big deal to add
> this later as well.
Agreed to hear some feedback before adding it. It's not an urgent feature.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
