On 9/23/17, 12:36 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>"Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> writes:
>> This looks reasonable to me as well. I haven't noticed any issues after
>> a couple hours of pgbench with aggressive autovacuum settings, either.
>
> Thanks for looking. As I'm sure you realize, what motivated that was
> not liking the switch into AutovacMemCxt that you'd added in
> autovacuum_do_vac_analyze ... with this patch, we can drop that.
Yup. I’ll go ahead and update that patch now.
Nathan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
