Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling
Date
Msg-id 15155.1506188183@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling
List pgsql-hackers
"Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> writes:
> This looks reasonable to me as well.  I haven't noticed any issues after
> a couple hours of pgbench with aggressive autovacuum settings, either.

Thanks for looking.  As I'm sure you realize, what motivated that was
not liking the switch into AutovacMemCxt that you'd added in
autovacuum_do_vac_analyze ... with this patch, we can drop that.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling
Next
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling