> On 04 May 2016, at 16:58, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru> writes:
>>> On 03 May 2016, at 00:59, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>>> I suspect that steering that ship would be a good idea starting with
>>> deprecation of the old name in 9.6, etc. hs_filter(), perhaps?
>
>> In 9.5 there already were tsvector functions length(), numnode(), strip()
>
>> Recent commit added setweight(), delete(), unnest(), tsvector_to_array(), array_to_tsvector(), filter().
>
>> Last bunch can be painlessly renamed, for example to ts_setweight, ts_delete, ts_unnest, ts_filter.
>
>> The question is what to do with old ones? Leave them as is? Rename to ts_* and create aliases with deprecation
warning?
>
> The other ones are not so problematic because they do not conflict with
> SQL keywords. It's only delete() and filter() that scare me.
>
> regards, tom lane
Okay, so changed functions to ts_setweight, ts_delete, ts_unnest, ts_filter.
--
Stas Kelvich
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
