Re: [doc] fix a potential grammer mistake - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [doc] fix a potential grammer mistake
Date
Msg-id 2965502.1659535006@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [doc] fix a potential grammer mistake  (Erikjan Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Responses Re: [doc] fix a potential grammer mistake
List pgsql-hackers
Erikjan Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> writes:
> I don't think these  "were"s  are wrong but arguably changing them to 
> "have" helps non-native speakers (like myself), as it doesn't change the 
> meaning significantly as far as I can see.

I think it does --- it changes the meaning from passive to active.
I don't necessarily object to rewriting these sentences more broadly,
but I don't think "have issued" is the correct phrasing.

Possibly "The user issued ..." would work.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: automatically generating node support functions
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade