Re: 9.4 beta - pg_get_viewdef() and WITH CHECK OPTION - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 9.4 beta - pg_get_viewdef() and WITH CHECK OPTION
Date
Msg-id 29532.1400463330@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.4 beta - pg_get_viewdef() and WITH CHECK OPTION  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 9.4 beta - pg_get_viewdef() and WITH CHECK OPTION  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> On 17 May 2014 13:25, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
>> when playing with 9.4 beta I noticed that the result of pg_get_viewdef()
>> will not include the new WITH CHECK OPTION clause when the view was created
>> using it.

> Yes, that's correct. pg_get_viewdef() only returns the underlying
> SELECT command for a view. This does not include any of the view's
> WITH parameters (check option and/or security barrier flag), because
> they aren't allowed in a SELECT statement.

> The additional parameters are held in pg_class.reloptions, and can be
> displayed from psql using \d+

I have to concur with the OP that this seems like a pretty darn weird
design choice.  reloptions are for nonstandard PG-specific options, not
for SQL-spec-mandated syntax.  What was the rationale for doing it like
that?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: How to solve the problem "error reading c:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.3\data\postgresql.conf during installation"
Next
From: Sandeep Gupta
Date:
Subject: slow query question: more indexes considered harmful