Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
> quote_ident() function doesn't quote reserved words ... as it IMHO is
> supposed to do.
You're right, it probably should. The equivalent code in pg_dump knows
about this, but quote_ident() doesn't.
One thing that's been on my mind with respect to all this is that it
would be nice not to quote "non-reserved" keywords. Most of the weird
non-SQL-spec keywords that we have are non-reserved, and we could more
easily keep them out of people's faces if we didn't quote them in dumps.
Of course such a policy would raise the ante for any change that makes
an existing keyword reserved when it wasn't before, but that's already
a dangerous kind of change.
regards, tom lane
