Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id 28e6f571-000e-f087-0553-c2ee41eac293@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 07/25/2018 06:08 PM, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> WITH ctename AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] (query)

I think "NOT MATERIALIZED" would be a bit misleading since the planner 
may choose to materialize anyway, so I suggest skipping that part of the 
syntax unless there is a really strong reason for having it.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?