Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id 20180726144654.GH17411@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:51:53PM +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> On 07/25/2018 06:08 PM, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >WITH ctename AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] (query)
> 
> I think "NOT MATERIALIZED" would be a bit misleading since the
> planner may choose to materialize anyway, so I suggest skipping that
> part of the syntax unless there is a really strong reason for having
> it.

If we're going to give people specific knobs to turn as part of
queries to affect query plans[1], we should think it through at a much
higher level than this.

If we're not going to do that right away, we just need to treat
instances where the wrong call was made as planner bugs and address
them at that level.

Best,
David.

[1] Not to use the word that starts with 'h' and sounds like lints http://pghintplan.osdn.jp/
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 11beta crash/assert caused by parameter type changes
Next
From: Nikhil Sontakke
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions