Re: pg_index.isclustered can work - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_index.isclustered can work
Date
Msg-id 28530.989893787@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_index.isclustered can work  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_index.isclustered can work  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I can easily have pg_index.indisclustered updated to 'true' if you ever
> CLUSTER the index.  Is that useful to anyone?  Remember, clustering
> doesn't remain if you modify the table.

I don't see any value in it as long as CLUSTER is in the disreputable
shape it's in.  I don't really like giving people the impression that
CLUSTER is a supported operation ;-)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: RE: Updating system catalogs after a tuple deletion
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: RE: Updating system catalogs after a tuple deletion