Re: text search vs schemas - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: text search vs schemas
Date
Msg-id 28488.1187327782@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: text search vs schemas  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: text search vs schemas  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Re: text search vs schemas  ("Trevor Talbot" <quension@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Uh, no.  Function names for example are subject to search-path
>> confusion.

> Wait, are they? They are in PL languages but only because most
> languages store their source code as text just as is happening here.

Hmmm ... if you look at the current solution for default expressions
for serial columns, ie nextval() on a regclass constant, it's pretty
schema-safe.  So we could imagine inventing a regconfig datatype that
is the same sort of wrapper-over-OID.  Then make the 2-parameter form
of to_tsvector take that type instead of text.

That seems like it'd fix the problem for expression indexes on
to_tsvector calls, but I don't see how it fixes the problem for
triggers.  We don't have any clear path for making trigger arguments
be anything but a list of strings.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: text search vs schemas
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: text search vs schemas