Re: Fix for log_min_error_messages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fix for log_min_error_messages
Date
Msg-id 28429.1043867811@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix for log_min_error_messages  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> I now realize panic isn't really off, but I don't expect panic to happen
>> too often.  :-)

> Just add a level past panic that actually says "off" and really is off.

Would anyone actually use it?  *Should* anyone actually use it?
I cannot imagine a situation where you don't want to see panic messages
(besides, there's always the option of routing the log to /dev/null...)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Chris Smith"
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC drivers and streaming content
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 port patches submitted