Re: Add support for AT LOCAL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Add support for AT LOCAL |
Date | |
Msg-id | 2820407.1697561128@sss.pgh.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Add support for AT LOCAL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Re: Add support for AT LOCAL |
List | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Yeah, the same thing occurred to me in the shower this morning, and it > does seem to work! We can replace both loops with a %= operator, at > least if we're willing to assume C99 division semantics, which seems > pretty safe in 2023. Whoops, no: for negative starting values we'd need truncate-towards- minus-infinity division whereas C99 specifies truncate-towards-zero. However, the attached does pass for me on cfarm111 as well as my usual dev machine. Presumably this is a pre-existing bug that also appears in back branches. But in the interests of science I propose that we back-patch only the test case and see which machine(s) fail it before back-patching the code change. regards, tom lane diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c index c4da10d47a..56c7746c11 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c @@ -3083,10 +3083,11 @@ timetz_zone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) result = (TimeTzADT *) palloc(sizeof(TimeTzADT)); result->time = t->time + (t->zone - tz) * USECS_PER_SEC; + /* C99 modulo has the wrong sign convention for negative input */ while (result->time < INT64CONST(0)) result->time += USECS_PER_DAY; - while (result->time >= USECS_PER_DAY) - result->time -= USECS_PER_DAY; + if (result->time >= USECS_PER_DAY) + result->time %= USECS_PER_DAY; result->zone = tz; @@ -3116,10 +3117,11 @@ timetz_izone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) result = (TimeTzADT *) palloc(sizeof(TimeTzADT)); result->time = time->time + (time->zone - tz) * USECS_PER_SEC; + /* C99 modulo has the wrong sign convention for negative input */ while (result->time < INT64CONST(0)) result->time += USECS_PER_DAY; - while (result->time >= USECS_PER_DAY) - result->time -= USECS_PER_DAY; + if (result->time >= USECS_PER_DAY) + result->time %= USECS_PER_DAY; result->zone = tz; diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/timetz.out b/src/test/regress/expected/timetz.out index 3f8e005ce7..cbab6cfe5d 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/timetz.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/timetz.out @@ -304,4 +304,25 @@ TABLE timetz_local_view; 23:59:59.99-07 | 06:59:59.99+00 | 06:59:59.99+00 | 06:59:59.99+00 | 06:59:59.99+00 (12 rows) +SELECT f1 AS dat, + f1 AT TIME ZONE 'UTC+10' AS dat_at_tz, + f1 AT TIME ZONE INTERVAL '-10:00' AS dat_at_int + FROM TIMETZ_TBL + ORDER BY f1; + dat | dat_at_tz | dat_at_int +----------------+----------------+---------------- + 00:01:00-07 | 21:01:00-10 | 21:01:00-10 + 01:00:00-07 | 22:00:00-10 | 22:00:00-10 + 02:03:00-07 | 23:03:00-10 | 23:03:00-10 + 08:08:00-04 | 02:08:00-10 | 02:08:00-10 + 07:07:00-08 | 05:07:00-10 | 05:07:00-10 + 11:59:00-07 | 08:59:00-10 | 08:59:00-10 + 12:00:00-07 | 09:00:00-10 | 09:00:00-10 + 12:01:00-07 | 09:01:00-10 | 09:01:00-10 + 15:36:39-04 | 09:36:39-10 | 09:36:39-10 + 15:36:39-05 | 10:36:39-10 | 10:36:39-10 + 23:59:00-07 | 20:59:00-10 | 20:59:00-10 + 23:59:59.99-07 | 20:59:59.99-10 | 20:59:59.99-10 +(12 rows) + ROLLBACK; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/timetz.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/timetz.sql index 33f7f8aafb..d797f478f0 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/timetz.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/timetz.sql @@ -100,4 +100,9 @@ CREATE VIEW timetz_local_view AS ORDER BY f1; SELECT pg_get_viewdef('timetz_local_view', true); TABLE timetz_local_view; +SELECT f1 AS dat, + f1 AT TIME ZONE 'UTC+10' AS dat_at_tz, + f1 AT TIME ZONE INTERVAL '-10:00' AS dat_at_int + FROM TIMETZ_TBL + ORDER BY f1; ROLLBACK;
pgsql-hackers by date: