Re: Add support for AT LOCAL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKdDBrh4PnW6Bw67wUmVHVzJMKH-3rK25NJg9nD9vUndg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add support for AT LOCAL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
List pgsql-hackers
Hmm, I guess I must have missed some important flag or environment
variable when trying to reproduce it, sorry.

Given that IBM describes xlc as "legacy" (replaced by xlclang, but
still supported for some unspecified period of time for the benefit of
people who need C++ ABI compatibility with old code), I wonder how
long we plan to support it...  Anecdotally, from a time 1-2 decades
ago when I used AIX daily, I can report that vast amounts of open
source stuff couldn't build with xlc, so gcc was used for pretty much
anything that didn't have a C++ ABI requirement.  I kinda wonder if a
single person in the entire world appreciates that we support this.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL