Re: autocommit in 7.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: autocommit in 7.4
Date
Msg-id 28184.1059629109@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autocommit in 7.4  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: autocommit in 7.4  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> The issue I have is that every interface that relies on libpq is going
> to have to code it itself.  Is that OK?

So?  Most interfaces have to adhere to their own notions of transaction
semantics and control API anyway.  libpq should stay out of their way
rather than try to be helpful.  I see this as not different from the
lesson we learned that doing it in the backend isn't the right place.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: followup on previous
Next
From: Sailesh Krishnamurthy
Date:
Subject: Re: this is in plain text (row level locks)