Re: What about Perl autodie? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: What about Perl autodie?
Date
Msg-id 27a8f7cb-1378-855e-2c50-a57302625a83@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What about Perl autodie?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: What about Perl autodie?
List pgsql-hackers
On 2024-02-08 Th 11:08, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 8 Feb 2024, at 16:53, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 2. Don't wait, migrate them all now.  This would mean requiring
>> Perl 5.10.1 or later to run the TAP tests, even in back branches.
>>
>> I think #2 might not be all that radical.  We have nothing older
>> than 5.14.0 in the buildfarm, so we don't really have much grounds
>> for claiming that 5.8.3 will work today.  And 5.10.1 came out in
>> 2009, so how likely is it that anyone cares anymore?
> I would vote for this option, if we don't run the trailing edge anywhere where
> breakage is visible to developers then it is like you say, far from guaranteed
> to work.
>

+1 from me too. We kept 5.8 going for a while because it was what the 
Msys (v1) DTK perl was, but that doesn't matter any more I think.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`