Re: What about Perl autodie? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: What about Perl autodie?
Date
Msg-id C3ECD7DF-0A33-47C3-9B38-6B443715DF23@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What about Perl autodie?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: What about Perl autodie?
Re: What about Perl autodie?
List pgsql-hackers
> On 8 Feb 2024, at 16:53, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> 2. Don't wait, migrate them all now.  This would mean requiring
> Perl 5.10.1 or later to run the TAP tests, even in back branches.
>
> I think #2 might not be all that radical.  We have nothing older
> than 5.14.0 in the buildfarm, so we don't really have much grounds
> for claiming that 5.8.3 will work today.  And 5.10.1 came out in
> 2009, so how likely is it that anyone cares anymore?

I would vote for this option, if we don't run the trailing edge anywhere where
breakage is visible to developers then it is like you say, far from guaranteed
to work.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: What about Perl autodie?
Next
From: Greg Sabino Mullane
Date:
Subject: Re: What about Perl autodie?