Re: MOVE LAST: why? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date
Msg-id 27934.1041984327@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MOVE LAST: why?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: MOVE LAST: why?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Refresh my memory: what is the point of inventing an additional LAST
>> keyword, when the behavior is exactly the same as MOVE ALL ?

> SQL compatibility, per Peter.

Oh, I see.  But then really it should be documented as a FETCH keyword,
not only a MOVE keyword.  Will fix.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Doug McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] I feel the need for speed. What am I doing wrong?
Next
From: "carl garland"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Have people taken a look at pgdiff yet?