Re: MOVE LAST: why? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date
Msg-id 200301072329.h07NT2X28922@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to MOVE LAST: why?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: MOVE LAST: why?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> > 2002-11-12 19:44  momjian
> > 
> >     * doc/src/sgml/ref/move.sgml, src/backend/commands/portalcmds.c,
> >     src/backend/executor/execMain.c, src/backend/parser/gram.y,
> >     src/backend/parser/keywords.c, src/backend/tcop/utility.c,
> >     src/include/commands/portalcmds.h, src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h:
> >     Make MOVE/FETCH 0 actually move/fetch 0.  Add MOVE LAST to move to
> >     end of cursor.
> 
> Refresh my memory: what is the point of inventing an additional LAST
> keyword, when the behavior is exactly the same as MOVE ALL ?

SQL compatibility, per Peter.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] I feel the need for speed. What am I doing
Next
From: Doug McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] I feel the need for speed. What am I doing wrong?