Re: Client application name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Client application name
Date
Msg-id 27924.1256136549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Client application name  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: Client application name
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> Should we perhaps change the behaviour of the backend to give a
> warning only for unknown settings in the startup packet?

It's not going to help, unless you first invent a time machine so
we can retroactively cause all PG servers that are already in the field
to behave that way.

> It doesn't
> seem beyond the realms of possibility that we might want to add
> something else in the future, and this will at least mean that in a
> few releases time it might be reasonably safe to do so.

This might be a good argument for changing that going forward, but
it will be *years* before we can rely on it for anything.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: u235sentinel
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: \du quite ugly in 8.4