Re: Per-session memory footprint (9.0/windows) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Per-session memory footprint (9.0/windows)
Date
Msg-id 2778.1299105762@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Per-session memory footprint (9.0/windows)  (Hannes Erven <hannes@erven.at>)
List pgsql-general
Hannes Erven <hannes@erven.at> writes:
> It is still about 5 MB of private memory per "idle" backend process. Is
> there anything I can do to optimize?

That sounds about the right ballpark for a working backend process with
caches loaded up.  If that's too much for you, you ought to be using
connection pooling.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Hannes Erven
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-session memory footprint (9.0/windows)
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: how to avoid repeating expensive computation in select