Re: Problems with avg on interval data type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Problems with avg on interval data type
Date
Msg-id 27697.990234861@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problems with avg on interval data type  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>> I suggest that the current code is more correct than you think ;-).
>> ISTM it is a good idea to require a units field, or at least some
>> punctuation giving a clue about units --- for example I do not object to
>> '08:00' being interpreted as hours and minutes.  But I would be inclined
>> to reject all four of the forms '+8', '-8', '8.0', and '8' as ambiguous.
>> Is there something in the SQL spec that requires us to accept them?

> Single-field signed integers (and unsigned integers?) must be acceptable
> for a time zone specification (pretty sure this is covered in the SQL
> spec).

But surely there is other context cuing you that the number is a
timezone?  In any case, you weren't proposing that interval_in
should accept '8' as a timezone ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Interesting question