Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.
Date
Msg-id 27301.1287683879@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Tom Lane  wrote:
>>> I'm all for doing this client-side.

> Uh, why would we do this client-side rather than server-side?  If we do
> it server-side, all interfaces get it.

1. The API that's being implemented is JDBC-specific.

2. Even if you want to argue that it would be generally useful to have
such a feature, it would certainly require additional client-side
programming to make each client interface make use of it.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Domains versus arrays versus typmods
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.