Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I'm all for doing this client-side.
>
> Well, that makes a big difference. Unless someone can make a
> convincing argument for why we should modify the server side to
> support this, I think we should just focus on this one client-side
> patch.
>
> I'd be happy to give it a closer look, but I may not be able to do so
> for a few weeks, and won't complain if someone beats me to it.
Uh, why would we do this client-side rather than server-side? If we do
it server-side, all interfaces get it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
