Re: ERROR: found multixact XX from before relminmxid YY - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ERROR: found multixact XX from before relminmxid YY
Date
Msg-id 27242.1546044576@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to ERROR: found multixact XX from before relminmxid YY  (Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io>)
Responses Re: ERROR: found multixact XX from before relminmxid YY  (Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io>)
Re: ERROR: found multixact XX from before relminmxid YY  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-general
Mark Fletcher <markf@corp.groups.io> writes:
> Starting yesterday morning, auto vacuuming of one of our postgresql 9.6.10
> (CentOS 7) table's started failing:
> ERROR:  found multixact 370350365 from before relminmxid 765860874
> CONTEXT:  automatic vacuum of table "userdb.public.subs"

Ugh.

> Reading the various discussions about this error, the only solution I found
> was here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGewt-ukbL6WL8cc-G%2BiN9AVvmMQkhA9i2TKP4-6wJr6YOQkzA%40mail.gmail.com
> But no other reports of this solving the problem. Can someone verify that
> if I do the mentioned fix (and I assume upgrade to 9.6.11) that will fix
> the problem? And that it doesn't indicate table corruption?

Yeah, SELECT FOR UPDATE should overwrite the broken xmax value and thereby
fix it, I expect.  However, I don't see anything in the release notes
suggesting that we've fixed any related bugs since 9.6.10, so if this
just appeared then we've still got a problem :-(.  Did anything
interesting happen since your last successful autovacuum on that table?
Database crashes, WAL-related parameter changes, that sort of thing?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mark Fletcher
Date:
Subject: ERROR: found multixact XX from before relminmxid YY
Next
From: Mark Fletcher
Date:
Subject: Re: ERROR: found multixact XX from before relminmxid YY