On 09/14/2018 08:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'd go with #2, personally. It does seem that the costing needs work,
>> but it's not clear to me that we know what to change, so it's kinda
>> late to propose #3 for v11.
> +1. I also favor option #2.
>
+ about 0.8. I hope we do get some good field testing if it, though.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
