On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'd go with #2, personally. It does seem that the costing needs work,
> but it's not clear to me that we know what to change, so it's kinda
> late to propose #3 for v11.
+1. I also favor option #2.
--
Peter Geoghegan