Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=OMHjpdtDckVQg3tjqTPaDaRS7OMxEbfhrdJY2WQUg4A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'd go with #2, personally.  It does seem that the costing needs work,
> but it's not clear to me that we know what to change, so it's kinda
> late to propose #3 for v11.

+1. I also favor option #2.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: move PartitionDispatchData definition to execPartition.c