Re: Some download statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Some download statistics
Date
Msg-id 27068.1109276960@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Some download statistics  (Troels Arvin <troels@arvin.dk>)
Responses Re: Some download statistics  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Troels Arvin <troels@arvin.dk> writes:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:35:57 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Frankly, I'd suggest dropping the splits. Thoughts?

> I also found the split sources + a non-split sources version to be
> confusing. As you, I think that splitting should be dropped.

Perhaps the confusion issue could be addressed by keeping the split
sources in a separate subdirectory:
pub/source/v.8.0.1/    postgresql-8.0.1.tar.bz2    postgresql-8.0.1.tar.bz2.md5    postgresql-8.0.1.tar.gz
postgresql-8.0.1.tar.gz.md5   split-tarballs/        postgresql-base-8.0.1.tar.bz2
postgresql-base-8.0.1.tar.bz2.md5       etc...
 

I suspect the demand for the split tarballs is mighty low nowaways,
but it's probably not zero yet.

Also: I notice that the README file that's supposed to tell people about
the split-tarball scheme is not present in any of the recent-version
subdirectories, so it's no wonder that they are confused.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Where are we on stored procedures?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Some download statistics