> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Grittner
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:27 PM
> To: Jaime Casanova; David Fetter
> Cc: Josh Berkus; Joshua Kramer; Ian Bailey-Leung; PostgreSQL Advocacy
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Unlogged vs. In-Memory
>
> Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>
> >> +1 for Fast Tables.
> >
> > so, if i want my database to be fast i have to use those? that
> > name is pretty misleading.
>
> If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
> out there with "lightening tables". Built for speed but not
> persistence.
What about something like "Write Accelerated Tables"?
Brad.
