Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id 4DC17033020000250003D2B3@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  ("Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson@hp.com>)
Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Tree view 
Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:

>> +1 for Fast Tables.
>
> so, if i want my database to be fast i have to use those? that
> name is pretty misleading.

If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
out there with "lightening tables".  Built for speed but not
persistence.

Hey, nobody liked evanescent, so I'm trying a different route...

-Kevin

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory