Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=mPWwxaju72VuyEBrQLRUDcL0Gqw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>
>>> +1 for Fast Tables.
>>
>> so, if i want my database to be fast i have to use those? that
>> name is pretty misleading.
>
> If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
> out there with "lightening tables".  Built for speed but not
> persistence.
>

oh! that's easy! "mysql tables" or "pgISAM tables" ;)

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory