Re: pg_upgade vs config - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgade vs config
Date
Msg-id 26150.1475427245@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_upgade vs config  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_upgade vs config
Re: pg_upgade vs config
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> The biggest issue is this: the upgrade fails completely on 
> ltree-plpython and hstore-plpython, presumably because these modules 
> rely on the plpython module being loaded first. pg_upgrade rather 
> simple-mindedly calls LOAD on the object library to test if it's usable. 

FWIW, that seems to have worked fine yesterday on prairiedog.

I suspect the explanation is that macOS's dynamic linker is smart enough
to pull in plpython when one of those modules is LOAD'ed.  The ideal fix
would be to make that happen on all platforms.  I'm not actually sure
why it doesn't already; surely every dynamic linker in existence has
such a capability.

[ digs more deeply ... ]  Oh, weird: it looks like this succeeded in
every case except 9.6->HEAD upgrade.  Did we break something recently?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash Indexes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgade vs config