On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> For one thing, we can stop shipping a totally broken feature in release after release > > For what it's worth I'm for any patch that can accomplish that. > > In retrospect I think we should have done the hash-over-btree thing > ten years ago but we didn't and if Amit's patch makes hash indexes > recoverable today then go for it.
