On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2016-10-02 12:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> For one thing, we can stop shipping a totally broken feature in release
>> >> after release
>> >
>> > For what it's worth I'm for any patch that can accomplish that.
>> >
>> > In retrospect I think we should have done the hash-over-btree thing
>> > ten years ago but we didn't and if Amit's patch makes hash indexes
>> > recoverable today then go for it.
>>
>> +1.
>
> +1
And moved to next CF to make it breath.
--
Michael
