Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> It's not obvious to me that it has a use case outside of casts, but
>>> it's certainly possible I'm missing something.
>> A possible example is simplifying X + 0 to X, or X * 0 to 0.
> Oh, I see. The times I've seen an issue with those kinds of
> expressions have always been related to selectivity estimation.
Yeah, helping the planner recognize equivalent cases is at least as
large a reason for wanting this as any direct savings of execution time.
I don't mind confining the feature to casts to start with, but it might
be a good idea to specify the check-function API in a way that would let
it be plugged into a more generally available call-simplification hook
later.
regards, tom lane
