> On 8 May 2023, at 09:10, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 03.05.23 23:02, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
>> Thank you again for the review. Here is a patch with most of your feedback addressed. Sorry it has taken so long!
Thesepatches are rebased up to 1ab763fc22adc88e5d779817e7b42b25a9dd7c9e
>> (May 3).
>
> Here are a few small fixup patches to get your patch set compiling cleanly.
>
> Also, it looks like the patches 0002, 0003, and 0004 are not split up correctly. 0002 contains tests using the FOR
PORTIONOF syntax introduced in 0003, and 0003 uses the function build_period_range() from 0004.
These patches no longer apply without a new rebase. Should this patch be
closed in while waiting for the prequisite of adding btree_gist to core
mentioned upthread? I see no patch registered in the CF for this unless I'm
missing sometihng.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
