On 03.05.23 23:02, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> Thank you again for the review. Here is a patch with most of your
> feedback addressed. Sorry it has taken so long! These patches are
> rebased up to 1ab763fc22adc88e5d779817e7b42b25a9dd7c9e
> (May 3).
Here are a few small fixup patches to get your patch set compiling cleanly.
Also, it looks like the patches 0002, 0003, and 0004 are not split up
correctly. 0002 contains tests using the FOR PORTION OF syntax
introduced in 0003, and 0003 uses the function build_period_range() from
0004.