Re: C locale + unicode - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: C locale + unicode
Date
Msg-id 25167.1105727658@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C locale + unicode  (John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw@wardbrook.com>)
Responses Re: C locale + unicode  (John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw@wardbrook.com>)
List pgsql-general
John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw@wardbrook.com> writes:
> Do upper() and lower() only work correctly for postgres v8 UTF-8 encoded
> databases? (They don't seem to work on chars > standard ascii on my
> 7.4.6 db). Is this locale or encoding specific issue?

Before 8.0, they don't work on multibyte characters, period.  In 8.0
they work according to your locale setting.

> Is there likely to be a significant difference in speed between a
> database using a UTF-8 locale and the C locale (if you don't care about
> the small issues you detailed below)?

I'd expect the C locale to be materially faster for text sorting.
Don't have a number offhand.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John Sidney-Woollett
Date:
Subject: Re: C locale + unicode
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Much Ado About COUNT(*)