Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
Date
Msg-id 25150.1361616954@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2013/2/23 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>:
>> Why is that?  lookup_function_oid() only collects the oid to pass to
>> get_create_function_cmd(), why not just issue one query to the backend?
>> And use PSQLexec() to boot and get --echo-hidden, etc, for free?  And
>> eliminate the one-off error handling for just this case?

> yes, we can do it. There is only one issue

> routines for parsing function signature in regproc and regprocedure
> should be updated - and I would to get some agreement than I start to
> do modify core.

Uh ... you seem to be asking for a blank check to modify regprocedure,
which is unlikely to be forthcoming.  Why do you think these things need
to be changed, and to what?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Erik Rijkers"
Date:
Subject: Re: Show type in psql SELECT
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New hooks for snapshot and transaction ID acquisition from external source