On Wed, 2023-03-22 at 12:16 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I've posted a
> patch for that at
> http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaSCkg9ww9oppPqqs+9RVqCexYCE6Aq=UsYPfnOoDeFkw@mail.gmail.com
> and AFAICT everyone agrees with the idea, even if the patch itself
> hasn't yet attracted any code reviews. But although the two patches
> are fairly closely related, this seems to be a good idea whether that
> moves forward or not, and that seems to be a good idea whether this
> moves forward or not. As this one has had more review and discussion,
> my current thought is to try to get this one committed first.
The current patch (non-superuser-subscriptions) is the most user-facing
aspect, and it seems wrong to commit it before we have the security
model in a reasonable place. As you pointed out[1], it's not in a
reasonable place now, so encouraging more use seems like a bad idea.
The other patch you posted seems like it makes a lot of progress in
that direction, and I think that should go in first. That was one of
the items I suggested previously[2], so thank you for working on that.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoavSQVcvEW3ZgZ7a1Q-TJ-fp0%2BNt7W3D7FCawArtTCBCQ%40mail.gmail.com
[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27c557b12a590067c5e00588009447bb5bb2dd42.camel@j-davis.com
