Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> On 11/02/2014 11:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Nothing that I recall at the moment, but there is certainly plenty of
>> stuff of dubious quality in there. I'd argue that chkpass, intagg,
>> intarray, isn, spi, and xml2 are all in worse shape than the money type.
> Why are we holding on to xml2 again?
IIRC, there's some xpath-related functionality in there that's not
yet available in core (and needs some redesign before it'd ever get
accepted into core, so there's not a real quick fix to be had).
regards, tom lane
