Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ?
Date
Msg-id 24689.948577420@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: More efficient DELETE ... ?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> In fact, someone can just remove the #ifdef WARN_FROM defines around the
> code and regenerate the regression tests and all will stay in sync.

IIRC, Thomas felt that his outer join changes were going to break those
warnings anyway --- that's why we had them commented out.  No point in
trying to turn them on until the outer-join dust settles.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: gav
Date:
Subject: how many inserts in one transaction?
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ?