Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Date
Msg-id 24529.1238175103@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> Simon's idea of "profiles" sounds worth pursuing to me, but clearly
>> it's not happening for 8.4.

> I don't see why having a *separate* concept of profiles in addition to 
> the ROLES is helpful.  It seems like building a whole new house when all 
> we really need is to expand the garage.

Simon already pointed out one major reason: we can define the semantics
of such things without creating any backwards-compatibility issues,
whereas fooling with the behavior of roles by themselves is likely to
create some issues.

However, this is all 8.5 material in any case, and I'm going to stop
paying attention now because I'm trying to get to 8.4 beta.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 open items list
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?