Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070903271032j95b02a8l957175c205ef4509@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I think this is way over-engineered.  All we really need here is a
>> command along the lines of RESET ALL AS CURRENT USER that gives every
>> GUC the value it would have had if you logged in under the current
>> user's account.  Simple, clean, no new keywords.
>
> Doesn't do anything for autovacuum though...

Nope, but I think that can be solved separately.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 open items list