Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date
Msg-id 24469.1151425715@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?  (Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:23:13AM +0900, Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823764/EN-US/

> No, it says it occurs if this condition is met: "A single *send* call or 
> *WSASend* call fills the whole underlying socket send buffer."

It also says that the condition only occurs if the program uses
non-blocking sockets ... which the backend does not.  So this page
offers no support for the proposed patch.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Pljava-dev] char with trailing space, PreparedStatement.setObject & SetString]
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC