On 05/08/2018 09:19 AM, Chapman Flack wrote:
>
> While PostgreSQL certainly has extensions to and divergences from
> standard SQL syntax, some historical and some recent, it seems like
> there ought to be a highish bar for adding new ones; or, looking at it
> another way, has this feature been proposed to the SQL committee?
> It doesn't sound like a bad idea, and supporting new syntax for it
> would be an easier call it if it were known to be in an SQL draft
> somewhere.
There seems to have been some work at Databricks adding higher-order
function syntax to their SQL; they've chosen the name 'transform'
for 'map', and also provided 'exists', 'filter', and 'aggregate'.
https://databricks.com/blog/2017/05/24/working-with-nested-data-using-higher-order-functions-in-sql-on-databricks.html
-Chap
