On 19/5/25 16:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> [snip]
> For one thing, I'm not sure how to teach the compiler that casting
> "Query *" to "ConstQuery *" is okay but vice versa isn't.
>
> Does C++ have a better story in this area?
Hi,
A C++ compiler *does* enforce "const correctness" (for examples
see, for example, Meyer's fantastic "Efficient C++" series).
It seems that Postgres is approaching the class of complexity/maturity
that (modern) C++ was designed to solve. It should be unmatched in that
area. I believe that, with recent platform deprecations, the vast
majority of systems where one can compile a modern Postgres should
already have a decent C++ compiler available (g++ & clang probably cover
>95%)
As opposed to say, rewriting in Rust ---where the compilar also does a
very substantial checking of semantics at compile time---, introducing
some C++ in Postgres could be as simple as throwing some "#ifdef
__cplusplus__ extern "C" { #endif" in the headers and use the required
subset in certain modules *only*.
(this is how, for instance, Bacula did it ~two decades ago)
The planner and parts of the bufmgr / arenas (palloc et al.) seem to me
as the most obvious candidates to try. I'm not sure whether it'd
introduce any unintended regressions, though.
> I haven't touched it
> in so long that I don't remember.
C++ 17 would be the standard to tackle, IMHO.
HTH,
J.L.
--
Parkinson's Law: Work expands to fill the time alloted to it.
