Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

19 May

• 02:31   Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only Tom Lane
• 06:19   Re: wrong query results on bf leafhopper Robins Tharakan
• 06:34   Re: Suggestion: Update Copyright Year to 2025 in Recently Added Files Tom Lane
• 08:03   Ge Yuxiang added you to the postgresql group Ge Yuxiang
• 09:48   Re: Make wal_receiver_timeout configurable per subscription Amit Kapila
• 10:05   Re: support fast default for domain with constraints jian he
• 12:05   Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart Amit Kapila
• 12:43   Re: Backward movement of confirmed_flush resulting in data duplication. Amit Kapila
• 13:25   Re: Should we optimize the `ORDER BY random() LIMIT x` case? Aleksander Alekseev
• 15:35   Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only Robert Haas
• 16:23   Re: [PoC] XMLCast (SQL/XML X025) Jim Jones
• 17:26   Re: [PoC] XMLCast (SQL/XML X025) Robert Haas
• 17:39   Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only Robert Haas
• 17:45   Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only Tom Lane
• 17:51   Re: wrong query results on bf leafhopper Andres Freund
• 18:05   Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements Peter Eisentraut
• 18:10   Re: Proposal: Make cfbot fail on patches not created by "git format-patch" Jacob Champion
• 18:19   Re: Make wal_receiver_timeout configurable per subscription Robert Haas
• 18:29   Re: Proposal: Make cfbot fail on patches not created by "git format-patch" Florents Tselai
• 18:38   Re: Should we optimize the `ORDER BY random() LIMIT x` case? Nico Williams
• 18:49   Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only Jose Luis Tallon
• 19:38   Re: Remove Instruction Synchronization Barrier in spin_delay() for ARM64 architecture Nathan Bossart
• 19:42   Re: strange perf regression with data checksums Peter Geoghegan
• 19:51   Re: Statistics Import and Export Nathan Bossart
• 20:02   Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3 Jeff Davis
• 21:04   Re: Should we optimize the `ORDER BY random() LIMIT x` case? Andrei Lepikhov
• 21:07   Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3 Robert Haas
• 21:19   Re: strange perf regression with data checksums Peter Geoghegan
• 22:01   Re: Should we optimize the `ORDER BY random() LIMIT x` case? Vik Fearing
• 22:45   Re: strange perf regression with data checksums Peter Geoghegan
• 23:29   Re: strange perf regression with data checksums Peter Geoghegan