Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()?
Date
Msg-id 24293.1460646787@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> IO::Socket::INET is another option, but I am not seeing it in perl <
>> 5.12, and that's not part of ActivePerl, which makes life harder on
>> Windows. Socket is available on both. Does that address your concerns?

> And this gives the patch attached, just took the time to hack it.

I think this is a good idea, but (1) I'm inclined not to restrict it to
Windows, and (2) I think we should hold off applying it until we've seen
a failure or two more, and can confirm whether d1b7d4877 does anything
useful for the error messages.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup creates a corrupt file for pg_stat_tmp and pg_replslot on a backup location
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Pglogical questions and problems